<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://sfb-higher-invariants.app.uni-regensburg.de/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=The_root_functor</id>
	<title>The root functor - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://sfb-higher-invariants.app.uni-regensburg.de/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=The_root_functor"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sfb-higher-invariants.app.uni-regensburg.de/index.php?title=The_root_functor&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-17T04:14:56Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.39.11</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://sfb-higher-invariants.app.uni-regensburg.de/index.php?title=The_root_functor&amp;diff=3133&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Cid36224: Created page with &quot;Operads can be seen as a generalization of categories, where morphisms are allowed to have multiple inputs but still a single output. As oo-categories are designed to model ‘categories-up-to-homotopy’, the formalism of oo-operads serves to model ‘operads-up-to-homotopy’, where composition is defined only up to homotopy and higher coherence laws substitute equalities in the defining axioms.    Many oo-operads arise from their strict counterparts by a process o...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sfb-higher-invariants.app.uni-regensburg.de/index.php?title=The_root_functor&amp;diff=3133&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2025-06-22T16:15:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;Operads can be seen as a generalization of categories, where morphisms are allowed to have multiple inputs but still a single output. As oo-categories are designed to model ‘categories-up-to-homotopy’, the formalism of oo-operads serves to model ‘operads-up-to-homotopy’, where composition is defined only up to homotopy and higher coherence laws substitute equalities in the defining axioms.    Many oo-operads arise from their strict counterparts by a process o...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Operads can be seen as a generalization of categories, where morphisms are allowed to have multiple inputs but still a single output. As oo-categories are designed to model ‘categories-up-to-homotopy’, the formalism of oo-operads serves to model ‘operads-up-to-homotopy’, where composition is defined only up to homotopy and higher coherence laws substitute equalities in the defining axioms.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many oo-operads arise from their strict counterparts by a process of localization — that is, by formally inverting some specified set of arrows. This phenomenon is not new: by a well known result of Joyal, *every* oo-category is equivalent to the localization of a strict category.  In this talk, I will extend this result, and by means of what I call &amp;#039;the root functor&amp;#039; show that every oo-operad can be obtained as the localization of a strict operad, explicitly characterized. Essential to this will be the dendroidal formalism for oo-operads, where morphisms with multiple inputs are modeled by trees. As an application, I will deduce a characterization of the oo-category of algebras over an oo-operad as that of locally constant algebras over its strict resolution.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cid36224</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>