<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://sfb-higher-invariants.app.uni-regensburg.de/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Monadic_resolutions_for_%28generalized%29_spaces</id>
	<title>Monadic resolutions for (generalized) spaces - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://sfb-higher-invariants.app.uni-regensburg.de/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Monadic_resolutions_for_%28generalized%29_spaces"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sfb-higher-invariants.app.uni-regensburg.de/index.php?title=Monadic_resolutions_for_(generalized)_spaces&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-03T03:49:24Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.39.11</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://sfb-higher-invariants.app.uni-regensburg.de/index.php?title=Monadic_resolutions_for_(generalized)_spaces&amp;diff=3530&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Vom41941: Created page with &quot;Understanding the homotopy type of a space often benefits from studying its values under homology theories. Every homology theory determines a Bousfield localization on the category of spaces — for example, rational cohomology leads to rationalization, while $F_p$-homology induces $p$-completion.  In favorable cases, these localizations admit explicit descriptions via monadic resolutions.  A key example is the $p$-completion $L_p X$ of a nilpotent space $X$, which can...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sfb-higher-invariants.app.uni-regensburg.de/index.php?title=Monadic_resolutions_for_(generalized)_spaces&amp;diff=3530&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-05-01T08:00:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;Understanding the homotopy type of a space often benefits from studying its values under homology theories. Every homology theory determines a Bousfield localization on the category of spaces — for example, rational cohomology leads to rationalization, while $F_p$-homology induces $p$-completion.  In favorable cases, these localizations admit explicit descriptions via monadic resolutions.  A key example is the $p$-completion $L_p X$ of a nilpotent space $X$, which can...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Understanding the homotopy type of a space often benefits from studying its values under homology theories. Every homology theory determines a Bousfield localization on the category of spaces — for example, rational cohomology leads to rationalization, while $F_p$-homology induces $p$-completion. &lt;br /&gt;
In favorable cases, these localizations admit explicit descriptions via monadic resolutions. &lt;br /&gt;
A key example is the $p$-completion $L_p X$ of a nilpotent space $X$, which can be expressed as an inverse limit:&lt;br /&gt;
$L_p X = lim_n (\Omega^\infty F_p \otimes \Sigma^\infty)^{n+1}(X)$.&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly, any nilpotent space $X$ can be expressed as the inverse limit &lt;br /&gt;
$X = lim_n (\Omega^\infty MU \otimes \Sigma^\infty)^{n+1}(X)$ of its iterated $MU$-homology, giving rise to the unstable Adams—Novikov spectral sequence.&lt;br /&gt;
A fundamental ingredient in proving this equivalence is Bousfield and Kan&amp;#039;s celebrated principal fibration lemma. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this talk, I will discuss how these ideas extend to oo-topoi and explain their application in motivic homotopy theory. In particular, I will sketch a proof of the principal fibration lemma in this broader context. &lt;br /&gt;
This is joint work with Tom Bachmann and Anton Engelmann.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vom41941</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>